Oh. my. gosh.
Dear AIESECers,
Over the last twelve years, the leaders of AIESEC U.S. (both staff and students) have dreamt of, envisioned and pursued an AIESEC that was bigger and better from that which they first joined. These leaders have consistently envisioned an AIESEC that was a household name, did thousands of quality exchanges a year, provided students with unparalleled cultural and professional opportunities, and that truly, on a large scale, helped to create international understanding and cooperation. To that end, the AIESEC U.S. leadership (past and present) has put in an uncanny amount of hard work, energy, and passion into building a viable organization capable of supporting such an incredible and achievable vision.
This vision was nearly achieved. However, for a number of reasons, the officers and senior team of AIESEC U.S. have found themselves in a place where achieving the vision is no longer possible within the existing current conditions. Due to the actions taken in recent months by some of the US membership, AIESEC International, their Supervisory Group, and the AIESEC US Board of Directors we believe the only choice is for us to transition out. There is no viable way to continue the effort. We have offered to the AIESEC US Board of Directors a transition plan so that AIESEC US is not at risk.
While this is unfortunate and disappointing for all of us, we want to thank everyone who has supported the pursuit of the AIESEC that we all thought was possible. That includes everyone within AIESEC U.S., alumni, and our external support. Furthermore, we want to thank those leaders that came before us for the opportunity that you gave us to continue pursuing this vision.
We wish the best for AIESEC U.S.
Sincerely,
Carly Lewis
Paul Fawell

6 Comments:
who actually thinks this is a good thing? i know there needs to be a change, but i don't think the board forcing the mc to resign was the right way to do things.
so now whats next?
Sydney, they resigned of their own accord.
fine, preston, they "resigned of their own accord", but that still brings up the topic of whats next? how will we become sustainable? hopefully all this will be answered in plenary.
Sustainability in AIESEC has always been related to the tension between Centralization/Decentralizaton issue - whether it's between LC and MC or MC and AI.
If you examine this further, it's a trade off between Efficiency and Resiliency. Efficiency requires less participation, resiliency demands more.
The closer you get in doing this balancing act (within context), the better it is (easier said than done)
I wish I could know more...Samuel Ticha
I still feel like there are huge gaping plot holes in this whole story, I need cliff notes :\
Post a Comment
<< Home